Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
New Media & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siapera, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From couch potatoes to cybernauts? The expanding notion of the audience on TV channels’ websites

Eugenia Siapera

University of Amsterdam esiapera{at}uva.nl

The new media rhetoric, with its emphasis on radical breaks from old media, often masks the degree to which continuity goes hand-in-hand with change. Moreover, the industry’s vision of convergence ignores the competing versions of, and struggles over, the digital future. Against this background, this article focuses on an inter-media site, broadcasters’ websites, seeks to identify the changes and continuities in the notion of the audience, and interprets these in the light of inter-media competition. Using a variant of discourse analysis, which makes hyperlinks its unit of analysis, this study has identified six understandings of the audience online: spectators, fans, consumers, citizens, students, and cybernauts. These reveal that television has merely expanded online, but not really changed its understandings of audiences, suggesting that in its struggle for dominance, television has chosen to stamp the internet with the televisual, rather than making full use of the internet’s potential.

Key Words: audiences • broadcasters • inter-media competition • internet • television • websites

New Media & Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 155-172 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1461444804041446


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ConvergenceHome page
V. S. Sundet and E. Ytreberg
Working Notions of Active Audiences: Further Research on the Active Participant in Convergent Media Industries
Convergence, November 1, 2009; 15(4): 383 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
E. Ytreberg
Extended liveness and eventfulness in multi-platform reality formats
New Media Society, June 1, 2009; 11(4): 467 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
Y. Beyer, G. S. Enli, A. J. Maaso, and E. Ytreberg
Small Talk Makes a Big Difference: Recent Developments in Interactive, SMS-Based Television
Television New Media, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 213 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]