This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Papacharissi, Z. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups

Temple University, USA zpapacha{at}temple.edu

The proponents of cyberspace promise that online discourse will increase political participation and pave the road for a democratic utopia. This article explores the potential for civil discourse in cyberspace by examining the level of civility in 287 discussion threads in political newsgroups. While scholars often use civility and politeness interchangeably, this study argues that this conflation ignores the democratic merit of robust and heated discussion. Therefore, civility was defined in a broader sense, by identifying as civil behaviors that enhance democratic conversation. In support of this distinction, the study results revealed that most messages posted on political newsgroups were civil, and further suggested that because the absence of face-to-face communication fostered more heated discussion, cyberspace might actually promote Lyotard’s vision of democratic emancipation through disagreement and anarchy (Lyotard, 1984). Thus, this study supported the internet’s potential to revive the public sphere, provided that greater diversity and volume of discussion is present.

Key Words: civility • internet • online • politeness • political

New Media & Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 259-283 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1461444804041444


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Singer Separate Spaces: Discourse About the 2007 Scottish Elections on a National Newspaper Web Site International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2009; 14(4): 477 - 496. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Gil De Zuniga, E. Puig-I-Abril, and H. Rojas Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment New Media Society, June 1, 2009; 11(4): 553 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Coleman, P. Lieber, A. L. Mendelson, and D. D. Kurpius Public life and the internet: if you build a better website, will citizens become engaged? New Media Society, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 179 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hooghe and W. Teepe Party profiles on the web: an analysis of the logfiles of non-partisan interactive political internet sites in the 2003 and 2004 election campaigns in Belgium New Media Society, December 1, 2007; 9(6): 965 - 985. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Dahlberg Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation New Media Society, October 1, 2007; 9(5): 827 - 847. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Ogan, F. Cicek, and M. Ozakca Letters to Sarah: analysis of email responses to an online editorial New Media Society, August 1, 2005; 7(4): 533 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF]