Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
New Media & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baym, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships

Nancy K. Baym

University of Kansas, USA

Yan Bing Zhang

University of Kansas, USA

Adrianne Kunkel

Purdue University, USA, adkunkel{at}ku.edu

Andrew Ledbetter

University of Kansas, USA

Mei-Chen Lin

Kent State University, USA

This study examines the relationship between relational quality and media use in relationships. In addition, the impacts of other potentially important variables such as the sex and relationship type of the participants and their partners are explored. College student participants focused on interaction experiences with an acquaintance, friend, romantic partner or family member. The results indicated that participant sex and partner sex did not affect reported media use, whereas relationship type had significant effects on the extent to which face-to-face and telephone communication were used. Relationships with acquaintances had the lowest relational quality and romantic relationships, while closer, were less satisfying than either family or friendship relationships. Same-sex relationships were perceived as more satisfying than cross-sex relationships. Finally, media use did not predict relational closeness or satisfaction.

Key Words: media use • relational closeness • relational quality • relational satisfaction • relationship type • sex

References

  • Albrecht, T.L. and M.B. Adelman (1987) `Dilemmas of Supportive Communication', in T.L. Albrecht and M.B. Adelman (eds) Communicating Social Support, pp. 240—54. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Argyle, M. and M. Henderson (1985) The Anatomy of Relationships. London: Heinemann.
  • Aries, E. (1996) Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Arliss, L. and D. Borisoff (1993) Women and Men Communicating: Challenges and Changes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Arnold, L.B. (1995) `Through the Narrow Pass: Experiencing Same-sex Friendship in Heterosexual(ist) Settings', Communication Studies 46: 234—44.
  • Aukett, R., J. Ritchie and K. Mill (1988) `Gender Differences in Friendship Patterns', Sex Roles 19(1): 57—66.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Baxter, L.A. (1986) `Gender Differences in Heterosexual Relationship Rules Embedded in Break-Up Accounts', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 3(3): 289—306.[Abstract]
  • Baym, N.,Y.B. Zhang and M.C. Lin (2004) `Social Interaction across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Face-to-Face and Telephone', New Media & Society 6(1): 41—60.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Berger, C.R., M.D. Weber, M.E. Munley and J.T. Dixon (1977) `Interpersonal Relationship Levels and Interpersonal Attraction', in B.D. Rubin (ed.) Communication Yearbook 1, pp. 245—61. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Berscheid, E., M. Snyder and A.M. Omoto (1989) `The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(5): 792—807.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boneva, B. and R. Kraut (2002) `Email, Gender and Personal Relationships', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 404—30. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Boneva, B., R. Kraut and D. Frohlich (2001) `Using E-mail for Personal Relationships: the Difference Gender Makes', American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 530—49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bruess, C.J.S. and J.C. Pearson (1996) `Gendered Patterns in Family Communication', in J. Wood (ed.) Gendered Relationships, pp. 59—78. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Buck, R., R.E. Miller and W.F. Caul (1974) `Sex, Personality and Physiological Variables in the Communication of Affect via Facial Expression', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30(4): 587—96.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Buhrke, R.A. and D.R. Fuqua (1987) `Sex Differences in Same- and Cross-sex Supportive Relationships', Sex Roles 17(6): 339—52.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Canary, D.J. and T.M. Emmers-Sommer (1997) Sex and Gender Differences in Personal Relationships. New York: Guilford.
  • Canary, D.J. and K.S. Hause (1993) `Is There Any Reason to Research Sex Differences in Communication?', Communication Quarterly 41(2): 129—44.
  • Chen, W., J. Boase and B. Wellman (2002) `The Global Villagers: Comparing Internet Users and Uses Around the World', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 74—113. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Cohen, B.H. (2001) Explaining Psychological Statistics (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Cummings, J., B. Butler and R. Kraut (2000) `The Quality of Online Social Relationships', Communications of the ACM 45(7): 103—8.
  • Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel (1984) `Information Richness: a New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design', in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 191—233.[Web of Science]
  • Dimmick, J., S.L. Kline and L. Stafford (2000) `The Gratification Niches of Personal Email and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement and Complementarity', Communication Research 27(2): 227—48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Duck, S. and P.H. Wright (1993) `Reexamining Gender Differences in Friendships: a Close Look at Two Kinds of Data', Sex Roles 28(12): 709—27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Duck, S., D.J. Rutt, M.H. Hurst and H. Strejc (1991) `Some Evident Truths about Conversations in Everyday Relationships', Human Communication Research 18(2): 228—67.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Egland, K.L., B.H. Spitzberg and M.M. Zormeier (1996) `Flirtation and Conversational Competence in Cross-sex Platonic and Romantic Relationships', Communication Reports 9(2): 105—15.
  • Green, S.B. and N.J. Salkind (2003) Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data (3rd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hall, J.A. (1984) Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication, Accuracy and Expressive Styles. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hall, J.A. (1998) `How Big Are Nonverbal Sex Differences? The Case of Smiling and Sensitivity to Nonverbal Cues', in D. Canary and K. Dindia (eds) Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication, pp. 155—77. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Katz, J.E. and R.E. Rice (2002) Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kavanaugh, A.L. and S.J. Patterson (2002) `The Impact of Community Computer Networks on Social Capital and Community Involvement in Blacksburg', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 325—44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Knapp, M.L., D.G. Ellis and B.A. Williams (1980) `Perceptions of Communication Behavior Associated with Relationships Terms', Communication Monographs 47(4): 262—78.[Web of Science]
  • Kraut, R., M. Patterson,V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukhopadhyay and W. Scherlis (1998) `Internet Paradox: a Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?', American Psychologist 53(9): 1017—31.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kunkel, A.W. and B.R. Burleson (1998) `Social Support and the Emotional Lives of Men and Women: An Assessment of the Different Cultures Perspective', in D. Canary and K. Dindia (eds) Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication, pp. 101—25. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kunkel, A.W. and B.R. Burleson (1999) `Assessing Explanations for Sex Differences in Emotional Support: A Test of the Different Cultures and Skill Specialization Accounts', Human Communication Research 25(3): 307—40.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin (1987) `Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-face Groups', American Sociological Review 52(3): 320—79.
  • McPherson, J.M., L. Smith-Lovin and J.M. Cook (2001) `Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks', in K.S. Cook and J. Hagan (eds) Annual Review of Sociology, Palo Alto. CA. 27(1): 415—44.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • MacGeorge, E.L., A.R. Graves, B. Feng, S.J. Gillihan and B.R. Burleson (2004) `The Myth of Gender Cultures: Similarities Outweigh Differences in Men's and Women's Provision of and Responses to Supportive Communication', Sex Roles 50(3): 143—75.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mazur, E. and R.R. Olver (1987) `Intimacy and Structure: Sex Differences in Imagery of Same-sex Friendships', Sex Roles 16(11): 539—58.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Monsour, M., B. Harris, N. Kurzweil and C. Beard (1994) `Challenges Confronting Cross-sex Friendships: "Much Ado about Nothing?"', Sex Roles 31(11): 55—77.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Monsour, M.,V. Harvey and S. Betty (1997) `A Balance Theory Explanation of Challenges Confronting Cross-sex Friendships', Sex Roles 37(11): 825—45.[Web of Science]
  • O' Connor, P. (1992) Friendships between Women: A Critical Review. New York: Guilford.
  • O'Meara, J.D. (1989) `Cross-sex Friendship: Four Basic Challenges of an Ignored Relationship', Sex Roles 21: 525—43.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Parks, M.R. (1982) `Ideology in Interpersonal Communication: Off the Couch and into the World', in M. Burgoon (ed.) Communication Yearbook 5, pp. 79—108. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Parks, M.R. (1995) `Ideology in Interpersonal Communication: Beyond the Couches, Talkshows and Bunkers', in B.R. Burleson (ed.) Communication Yearbook 18, pp. 480—97. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Parks, M.R. and K. Floyd (1996) `Making Friends in Cyberspace', Journal of Communication 46(1): 80—97.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Parks, M.R. and L.D. Roberts (1998) `'Making MOOsic': the Development of Personal Relationships On Line and a Comparison to Their Offline Counterparts', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15(4): 517—37.[Abstract]
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project ( 2000) `Tracking Online Life: How Women Use the Internet to Cultivate Relationships with Family and Friends', 10 May, URL (consulted October 2004): http://pewinternet.org/reports/index.asp
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project ( 2002) `The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today's Technology', 10 May, URL (consulted October 2004): http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/index.asp
  • Quan-Haase, A., B. Wellman, J. Witte and K.N. Hampton (2002) `Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement and Sense of Community', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 291—324. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Rands, M. and G. Levinger (1979) `Implicit Theories of Relationship: an Intergenerational Study', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 645—61.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rawlins, W.K. (1992) Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics and the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Reis, H.T. (1998) `Gender Differences in Intimacy and Related Behaviors: Context and Process', in D. Canary and K. Dindia (eds) Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication, pp. 203—31. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Reis, H.T., M. Senchak and B. Solomon (1985) `Sex Differences in the Intimacy of Social Interaction: Further Examination of Potential Explanations', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 1204—17.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rosenthal, C.J. (1985) `Kin Keeping in the Familial Division of Labor ', Journal of Marriage and the Family 47: 965—974.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rosenthal, R., J.A. Hall, M.R. Dimatteo, P.L. Rogers and D. Archer (1979) Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication:The PONS Test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Short, J., E. Williams and B. Christie (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Stafford, L., S.L. Kline and J. Dimmick (1999) `Home E-mail: Relational Maintenance and Gratification Opportunities', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 43: 659—69.
  • Steinberg, R.J. (1986) `A Triangular Theory of Love', Psychological Review 93: 119—35.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Steinberg, R.J. (1987) `Liking versus Loving: A Comparative Evaluation of Theories', Psychological Bulletin 102: 331—45.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Strikwerda, R. and L. May (1992) `Male Friendship and Intimacy', in L. May and R. Strikwerda (eds) Rethinking Masculinity: Philosophical Explorations in Light of Feminism, pp. 95—110. Langhorne, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2003 ) `Surveying the Digital Future', 12 April, URL (consulted October 2004): http://ccp.ucla.edu/pages/internet-report.asp
  • Walther, J. (1996) `Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction', Communication Research 23: 3—43.
  • Wellman, B. and M. Gulia (1999) `Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone', in M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 167—94. New York: Routledge.
  • Werking, K. (1997) We're Just Good Friends:Women and Men in Nonromantic Relationships. New York: Guilford.
  • Winstead, B.A. (1986) `Sex Differences in Same-sex Friendships', in V.J. Derlega and B.A. Winstead (eds) Friendship and Social Interaction, pp. 81—99. New York: Springer-Verlag.

New Media & Society, Vol. 9, No. 5, 735-752 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1461444807080339
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 New Media SocietyHome page
J. Lewis and A. West
'Friending': London-based undergraduates' experience of Facebook
New Media Society, November 1, 2009; 11(7): 1209 - 1229.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 New Media SocietyHome page
A. M. Ledbetter
Patterns of media use and multiplexity: associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence
New Media Society, November 1, 2009; 11(7): 1187 - 1208.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 New Media SocietyHome page
S. Soderstrom
Offline social ties and online use of computers: A study of disabled youth and their use of ICT advances
New Media Society, August 1, 2009; 11(5): 709 - 727.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baym, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, M.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?