|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation
Lincoln Dahlberg
University of Queensland, Australia, l.dahlberg{at}uq.edu.au
Recently there has been some debate between deliberative democrats about whether the internet is leading to the fragmentation of communication into `like-minded' groups.This article is concerned with what is held in common by both sides of the debate: a public sphere model that aims for all-inclusive, consensus seeking rational deliberation that eliminates inter-group `polarizing' politics. It argues that this understanding of deliberative democracy fails to adequately consider the asymmetries of power through which deliberation and consensus are achieved, the inter-subjective basis of meaning, the centrality of respect for difference in democracy, and the democratic role of `like-minded' deliberative groups.The deliberative public sphere must be rethought to account more fully for these four aspects. The article draws on post-Marxist discourse theory and reconceptualizes the public sphere as a space constituted through discursive contestation.Taking this radicalized norm, it considers what research is needed to understand the democratic implications of the formation of `like-minded' groups online.
Key Words: deliberative democracy • fragmentation • internet • public sphere • radical democracy
References
- Balkin, J.M. (2004) `Political Organization and Political Discussion on the Internet', URL (consulted January 2006): http://balkin.blogspot.com/2004_01_25_balkin_archive.html
- Becker, B. and J. Wehner (2001) `Electronic Networks and Civil Society: Reflections on Structural Changes in the Public Sphere', in C. Ess and F. Sudweeks (eds) Culture, Technology, Communication:Towards an Intercultural Global Village, pp. 67—85. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Benhabib, S. (1996) `Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy ', in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 67—94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Bennett, L.W. (2003) `New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism ', in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 17—37. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Blumler, J.G. and M. Gurevitch (2001) `The New Media and Our Political Communication Discontents: Democratizing Cyberspace', Information, Communication & Society 4(1): 1—13.
- Boggs, C. (2000) The End of Politics: Corporate Power and the Decline of the Public Sphere. New York: Guilford Press.
- Curran, J. (2000) `Rethinking Media and Democracy', in J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds) Mass Media and Society, pp. 120—54. London: Arnold.
- Curran, J. (2003) `Global Journalism: a Case Study of the Internet ', in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 227—41. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Dahlberg, L. (2001) `The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums extending the Public Sphere', Information, Communication & Society 4(4): 615—33.[CrossRef]
- Dahlberg, L. (2004) `The Habermasian Public Sphere: a Specification of the Idealized Conditions of Democratic Communication', Studies in Social and Political Thought 10: 2—18.
- Dahlberg, L. (2005a) `The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?', Theory and Society 34(2): 111—36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Dahlberg, L. (2005b) `The Corporate Colonization of Online Attention and the Marginalization of Critical Communication?', Journal of Communication Inquiry 29(2): 1—21.
- Dahlberg, L. (2007) `The Internet and Discursive Exclusion', in L. Dahlberg and E. Siapera (eds)The Internet and Radical Democracy, pp. 128—47. London: Palgrave.
- Dahlgren, P. (2001) `The Public Sphere and the Net: Structure, Space and Communication', in L.W. Bennett and R.M. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, pp. 33—55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dean, J. (2002) Publicity's Secret:The Ideology of Technoculture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Downey, J. and N. Fenton (2003) `New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere ', New Media & Society 5(2): 185—202.[Abstract]
- Downing, J.D.H. (2001) Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dryzek, J.S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the `Postsocialist' Condition. New York: Routledge.
- Gallo, J. (2003) `Online Oppositional Communities as Discursive Counterpublics', paper resented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Toronto, October.
- Gandy, O. (2002) `The Real Digital Divide: Citizens versus Consumers ', in L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, pp. 448—60. London: Sage.
- Gimmler, A. (2001) `Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet', Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(4): 21—39.
- Gomez, J. (2004) `Dumbing Down Democracy: Trends in Internet Regulation, Surveillance and Control in Asia', Pacific Journalism Review 10(2): 130—50.
- Graham, G. (1999) The Internet: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
- Graham, T. (2002) `Deliberating in Online Forums: New Hope for the Public Sphere?', unpublished master's thesis Amsterdam School of Communications, University of Amsterdam.
- Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action.Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (trans. T. McCarthy) Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Habermas, J. (1989[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans T. Burger with F. Lawrence). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. W. Rehg) Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Habermas, J. (2004) `Public Space and Political Public Space — the Biographical Roots of Two Motifs in My Thoughts', Kyoto Prize Speech, Kyoto, 11 November, URL (consulted October 2005): http://homepage.mac.com/gedavis/JH/Kyoto_lecture_Nov_2004.pdf
- Habermas, J. (2005) `Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics', Acta Politica 40(3): 384—92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Habermas, J. (2006) `Political Communication in Media Society - Does Democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research', paper presented at the ICA Annual Convention Dresden, June, 2006.
- Hargittai, E. (2004) `The Changing Online Landscape: from Free-for-all to Commercial Gatekeeping', in P. Day and D. Schuler (eds) Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Actions/Global Interaction, pp. 66—76. New York: Routledge.
- Harmon, A. (2004) `Politics of the Web: Meet, Greet, Segregate, Meet Again', New York Times, 25 January, URL (consulted 5 June 2007): http://www.nytimes.com
- Hill, K.A. and J.E. Hughes (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Hoar, P. and W. Hope (2002) `The Internet, the Public Sphere and the "Digital Divide" in New Zealand', Journal of International Communication 8(2): 64—88.
- Horrigan, J.B. (2001) `Online Communities: Networks that Nurture Long-distance Relationships and Local Ties', Pew Internet & American Life Project, 31 October, URL (consulted 5 June 2007): http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Communities_Report.pdf
- Horrigan, J., K. Garrett and K. Resnick (2004) The Internet and Democratic Debate. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
- Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Jordan, T. (1999) Cyberpower:The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge.
- Jordan, T. and P.A. Taylor (2004) Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause. London: Routledge.
- Kellner, D. (2004) `The Media and the Crises of Democracy in the Age of Bush-2', Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 1(1): 29—58.[CrossRef]
- Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Times. London:Verso.
- Laclau, E. (1993) `Discourse', in R.E. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, pp. 431—37. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation(s) London: Verso.
- Laclau, E. (2000) `Power and Social Communication', Ethical Perspectives 7(2—3): 139—45.[CrossRef]
- Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy:Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. (2nd edn) London: Verso.
- McCaughey, M. and M.D. Ayers (eds) (2003) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
- McChesney, R.W. (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Meikle, G. (2002) Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet. London: Routledge.
- Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London:Verso.
- Mouffe, C., E. Laclau and I. Angus (1999) `An Interview with Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau ', Knowledge Network, URL (consulted January 2006): http://www.ianangus.ca/cp1.htm
- Mouffe, C. (2005) `For an Agonistic Public Sphere', in L. Tønder and L. Thomassen (eds.) Radical Democracy: Politics between abundance and lack, pp. 191—205. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
- Muhlberger, P. (2004) `Running Head:Values in Internet Political Discussion ', paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, URL (consulted May 2005): http://comunityconnections.heinz.cmu.edu/articles/abstracts.html#Polarization
- Murdock, G. and P. Golding (2004) `Dismantling the Digital Divide: Rethinking the Dynamics of Participation and Exclusion', in A. Calabrese and C. Sparks (eds) Towards a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-first Century, pp. 244—60. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Noveck, B.S. (2000) `Paradoxical Partners: Electronic Communication and Electronic Democracy', in P. Ferdinand (ed.) The Internet, Democracy and Democratization, pp. 18—35. London: Routledge.
- Papacharissi, Z. (2002) `The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere', New Media & Society 4(1): 9—27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Papacharissi, Z. (2004) `Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups'. New Media & Society 6(2): 259—83.[Abstract]
- Patelis, K. (2000) `e-Mediation by America Online', in R. Rogers (ed.) Preferred Placement: Knowledge Politics on the Web, pp. 50—63. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Akadamie.
- Poster, M. (1997) `Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere ', in D. Porter (ed.) Internet Culture, pp. 201—17. New York: Routledge.
- Rogers, R. and A. Zelman (2002) `Surfing for Knowledge in the Information Society ', in G. Elmer (ed.) Critical Perspectives on the Internet, pp. 63—86. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Salazar, J.F. (2003) `Articulating an Activist Imaginary: Internet as Counter Public Sphere in the Mapuche Movement, 1997/2002'. Media International Australia (Incorporating Culture and Policy) 107: 19—30.
- Savigny, H. (2002) `Public Opinion, Political Communication and the Internet', Politics 22(1): 1—8.[CrossRef]
- Selnow, G.W. (1998) Electronic Whistle-stops:The Impact of the Internet on American Politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Shapiro, A. (1999) The Control Revolution: How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World as We Know it. New York: Public Affairs.
- Sparks, C. (2001) `The Internet and the Global Public Sphere', in L.W. Bennett and R.M. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, pp. 75—95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Stromer-Galley, J. (2003) `Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users' Perspectives', Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 8(3), URL (consulted September 2005): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html
- Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Sunstein, C. (2003) Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Tanner, E. (2001) `Chilean Conversations: Internet Forum Participants Debate Augusto Pinochet's Detention', Journal of Communication 51(2): 383—403.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Terranova, T. (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.
- Van de Donk, W., D. Rucht and B.D. Loader (eds) (2004) Cyberprotest, New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. London: Routledge.
- Vegh, S. (2003) `Classifying Forms of Online Activism', in M. McCaughey and M.D. Ayers (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice, pp. 71—95. New York: Routledge.
- Warner, M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
- Webster, F. (ed.) (2001) Culture and Politics in the Information Age: A New Politics? London: Routledge.
- Weinberger, D. (2004) `Is There an Echo in Here?', Salon.com, 24 February, URL (consulted January 2006): http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/02/20/echo_chamber/index_np.html
- Wilhelm, A.G. (1999) `Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative is Online Political Discussion?', in B.N. Hague and B.D. Loader (eds) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age, pp. 154—77. London: Routledge.
- Wilhelm, A.G. (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
- Young, I.M. (1996) `Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy', in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference, pp. 120—35. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Young, I.M. (2001) `Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy ', Political Theory 29(5): 670—90.[Free Full Text]
New Media & Society, Vol. 9, No. 5,
827-847 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1461444807081228
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. Imre
National intimacy and post-socialist networking
European Journal of Cultural Studies,
May 1, 2009;
12(2):
219 - 233.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
