This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hooghe, M. Articles by Teepe, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Party profiles on the web: an analysis of the logfiles of non-partisan interactive political internet sites in the 2003 and 2004 election campaigns in Belgium

Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, Marc.Hooghe{at}soc.kuleuven.be

Wouter Teepe

Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands

During recent election campaigns non-partisan party profile websites (PPWs) have become hugely popular in various countries with multiparty systems, sometimes even attracting 25 percent of all voters. On these interactive websites, PPW users respond to policy questions, and their answers are used to calculate the distance between their own preferences and party agendas, resulting in an individualized `party profile'. PPWs can be seen as one of the few innovations in election campaigning that fully exploit the internet's interactive opportunities. The analysis in this article of the log files of 2003 and 2004 Belgian PPWs demonstrate that PPW users tend to be highly educated, male and young. Party and policy preferences of late PPW users (the final days before the elections) are not more crystallized than those of early PPW users (40 days before the elections). The article concludes with speculation on what this finding might reveal about campaign dynamics.

Key Words: Belgium • campaign dynamics • digital divide • election campaigns • internet use • interactive communication • party profile website

References

• American Sociological Association (1999) Code of Ethics. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
• Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld and W.N. McPhee (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Bimber, B. (2000) `Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet', Social Science Quarterly 81(3): 868—76.[Web of Science]
• Bimber, B. and R. Davis (2003) Campaigning Online.The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Coleman, S. (1999) `Can the New Media Invigorate Democracy?', Political Quarterly 70(2): 16—22.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Coleman, S. (2005) `New Mediation and Direct Representation: Reconceptualizing Representation in the Digital Age', New Media & Society 7(2): 177—98.[Abstract]
• Dalton, R. and M. Wattenberg (eds) (2000) Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Davis, R. and D. Owen (1998) New Media and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Diener, E. and R. Crandall (1978) Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Directie Verkiezingen (2004) Belgische Verkiezingen sinds 1830 [Belgian Elections since 1830]. Brussels: FOD Binnenlandse Zaken. (Consulted November 2004) http://www.elections.fgov.be/
• Erikson, R., C. Panagopoulos and C. Wlezien (2004) `Likely (and unlikely) Voters and the Assessment of Campaign Dynamics', Public Opinion Quarterly 68(4): 588—601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• European Social Survey (2004) URL (Consulted June 2005): http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/
• Gibson, R. and S. Ward (2000a) `British Party Activity in Cyberspace: New Media, Same Impact?', in R. Gibson and S. Ward (eds) Reinvigorating Democracy? British Politics and the Internet, pp. 107—28. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Gibson, R. and S. Ward (eds) (2000b) Reinvigorating Democracy? British Politics and the Internet. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Hebecker, E. (2002) `Experimentieren für den Ernstfall. Der Online-Wahlkampf, 2002' [`Experiments for the Case of Emergency. The Online Elections 2002'], Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B49—50: 48—54.
• Hooghe, M. and P. Stouthuysen (2001) `Het gebruik van het Internet door de Vlaamse politieke partijen' [`The Use of the Internet by Flemish Political Parties'], Res Publica 43(4): 507—27.
• Hooghe, M. and S.Vissers (2006) Still a Digital Divide? Trends in Internet Access and Use, 1997—2005. Leuven: Centre for Citizenship and Democracy.
• Internet Service Providers Assocation (2004 ) 22ste marktonderzoek: 31 oktober, 2004 [22nd Market Research, 31 October 2004]. Brussels: Internet Service Providers Assocation (Consulted June 2005) http://www.ispa.be
• Jennings, M.K. and V. Zeitner (2003) `Internet Use and Civic Engagement. A Longitudinal Analysis', Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3): 311—34.[Abstract]
• Johnston, R. (1992) `Party Identification and Campaign Dynamics', Political Behavior 14(2): 311—31.[CrossRef]
• Katz, J., R. Rice and P. Aspden (2001) `The Internet, 1995—2000, Access, Civic Involvement, and Social Interaction', American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 405—19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Korupp, S. and M. Szydlik (2005) `Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide', European Sociological Review 21(4): 409—22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Margolis, M. and D. Resnick (2000) Politics as Usual.The `Cyberspace Revolution'. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Morris, D. (1999) Vote.com. New York: Renaissance.
• Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert and M. Stansbury (2003) Virtual Inequality. Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek (2002 ) Enquâte naar de arbeidskrachten, 2002 [Labour Market Census 2002]. Brussels: Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek. (Consulted August 2004) http://statbel.fgov.be/downloads/lfs2017-,2003_nl.xls
• Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek (2003 ) Bevolking en Huishoudens Totale en Belgische bevolking [Belgian Population Census and Households]. Brussels: Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek. (Consulted August 2004) http://statbel.fgov.be/pub/d2/p201y2003_nl.pdf
• Norris, P. (2001) Digital Divide. Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Norris, P. (2002) `Campaign Communication', in L. LeDuc, R. Niemi and P. Norris (eds) Comparing Democracies 2, pp. 127—47. London: Sage.
• Norris, P. (2003) `Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites', Party Politics 9(1): 21—45.[Abstract]
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004) `Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups', New Media & Society 6(2): 259—83.[Abstract]
• Romer, D., K. Kenski, P. Waldman, C. Adasiewicz, and K.H. Jamieson (2003) Capturing Campaign Dynamics.The National Annenberg Election Survey. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Shannon, C. (1948) `A Mathematical Theory of Communication', The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379—423, 623—56.
• Stefik, M. (1995) Introduction to Knowledge Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2004) `Interactivity as Process and Interactivity as Product', The Information Society 20(5): 391—4.[CrossRef]
• Tkach-Kawasaki, L. (2003) `Politics@Japan: Party Competition on the Internet in Japan', Party Politics 9(1): 105—23.[Abstract]
• Ward, S. R. Gibson and W. Lusoli (2003) `Online Participation and Mobilisation in the UK: Hype, Hope and Reality', Parliamentary A fairs 56(4): 652—68.[CrossRef]
• West, D. (2004) E—Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review 64(1): 15—27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Williams, A. (2006) The Internet Election. Perspectives on the Web in Campaigning, 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Willis, S., and B. Tranter (2006) `Beyond the `Digital Divide': Internet Diffusion and Inequality in Australia, Journal of Sociology 42(1): 43—60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

New Media & Society, Vol. 9, No. 6, 965-985 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1461444807082726


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hooghe, M. Articles by Teepe, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?