New Media & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Media, War and Culture

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOWNES, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by McMILLAN, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
New Media & Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 157-179 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/14614440022225751

Defining Interactivity

A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions

EDWARD J. DOWNES

Boston University

SALLY J. McMILLAN

University of Tennessee

The literature on interactivity includes many assumptions and some definitions but few tools for operationalizing the concept of interactivity in computer-mediated environments. This article takes an early step in filling that gap. In-depth interviews with 10 individuals who work and teach in the field of interactive communication led to a conceptual definition of interactivity based on six dimensions: direction of communication, time flexibility, sense of place, level of control, responsiveness, and perceived purpose of communication. Suggestions are made for applying these dimensions to multiple forms of computer-mediated communication. Future research should empirically test the existence and application of these dimensions.

Key Words: computer-mediated communication • interactivity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
K. K. Halone
The Structuration of Racialized Sport Organizing
Journal of Communication Inquiry, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 22 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
G. Goggin and C. Spurgeon
Premium rate culture: the new business of mobile interactivity
New Media Society, October 1, 2007; 9(5): 753 - 770.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
M. Macdonald
Television debate, `interactivity' and public opinion: the case of the BBC's `Asylum Day'
Media Culture Society, July 1, 2007; 29(4): 679 - 689.
[PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
A. Kerr, J. Kucklich, and P. Brereton
New media - new pleasures?
International Journal of Cultural Studies, March 1, 2006; 9(1): 63 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
R. Cover
Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history
New Media Society, February 1, 2006; 8(1): 139 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
M. S. Yadav and R. Varadarajan
Interactivity in the Electronic Marketplace: An Exposition of the Concept and Implications for Research
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 1, 2005; 33(4): 585 - 603.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
S. Livingstone
Children's Use of the Internet: Reflections on the Emerging Research Agenda
New Media Society, June 1, 2003; 5(2): 147 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
J. A.G.M. van Dijk and L. de Vos
Searching for the Holy Grail: Images of Interactive Television
New Media Society, December 1, 2001; 3(4): 443 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]